Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and TX20 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SL102 was manufactured 4 years before the TX20 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX20 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the SL102 grades vs the TX20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. The entire galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony TX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony TX20
| SL102 | TX20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX20 over the Samsung SL102
| TX20 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX20
| SL102 | TX20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 has got outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony TX20 has sizing of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SL102 vs the TX20.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and TX20 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and TX20.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony TX20 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX20 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
| Also called | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | 133 grams (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $330 |