Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX200V, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL102 was unveiled 4 years prior to the TX200V which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SL102 matches up versus the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony TX200V
| SL102 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung SL102
| TX200V | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX200V
| SL102 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 offers outside measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX200V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL102 and the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and TX200V is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and TX200V.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Also called | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3.3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $500 |