Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28


97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Launched July 2011

Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Samsung SL102 versus Sony TX55, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The SL102 was manufactured 3 years before the TX55 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SL102 matches up versus the TX55 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony TX55
SL102 | TX55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Samsung SL102
TX55 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony TX55
SL102 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony TX55 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") along with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
See the Samsung SL102 versus Sony TX55 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SL102 against the TX55.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and TX55 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and TX55.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony TX55 to provide greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Also Known as | ES55 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 116 gr (0.26 lb) | 109 gr (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $130 | $350 |