Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
64 Imaging
67 Features
70 Overall
68
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2015
- Older Model is Sony A65
Photography Glossary Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Samsung SL102 and Sony A68, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and A68 (24MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL102 was revealed 7 years earlier than the A68 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SL102 grades versus the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 & Sony SLT-A68. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony A68
| SL102 | A68 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Samsung SL102
| A68 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 83 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony A68
| SL102 | A68 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung SL102 and Sony A68 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL102 compared to the A68.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and A68 is 96 and 64 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and A68.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL102 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A68 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A68 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sony SLT-A68 |
| Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-11-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 79 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | 610 grams (1.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 701 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 510 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $130 | $581 |
