Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also Known as PL65
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung SL620, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both are created by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL202 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL202 was announced very close to the SL620 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SL202 matches up against the SL620 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung SL620
| SL202 | SL620 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung SL202
| SL620 | SL202 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung SL620
| SL202 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 features physical dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SL202 vs the SL620.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and SL620 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and SL620.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung SL620 to produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung SL620 |
| Other name | PL50 | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $140 | $200 |