Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also Known as PL50
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SL202 was launched 23 months prior to the ST65 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SL202 grades versus the ST65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung ST65

 SL202 ST65 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung SL202

 ST65 SL202 
LaunchedJanuary 2011February 2009Newer by 23 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST65

 SL202 ST65 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 comes with outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 and the ST65.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and ST65 is 94 and 99 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The pic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and ST65.

As you can tell, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
Portrait photography with Samsung ST65
25
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 Street photography features
Samsung ST65 Street photography features
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
megapixel count decent (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung SL202
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
57
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography information
27
decently wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
37
very good max aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging advice
Samsung ST65 Vlogging advice
27
decently wide (28mm)
has face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
27
very good max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST65
 Samsung SL202Samsung ST65
General Information
Make Samsung Samsung
Model type Samsung SL202 Samsung ST65
Also called PL50 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2009-02-17 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) ()
Max aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.60 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168g (0.37 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $140 $130