Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched April 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung ST93, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are designed by Samsung. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL202 was announced 3 years earlier than the ST93 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SL202 matches up against the ST93 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST93. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung ST93
| SL202 | ST93 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Samsung SL202
| ST93 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2011 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung ST93
| SL202 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 features physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung ST93 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SL202 vs the ST93.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and ST93 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The graphic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and ST93.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST93 to produce greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung ST93 |
| Other name | PL50 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $140 | - |