Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Samsung SL202 and Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are produced by Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL202 was announced 10 months prior to the TL240 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SL202 grades versus the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL202 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung TL240
| SL202 | TL240 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung SL202
| TL240 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung TL240
| SL202 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 has outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL202 and Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SL202 versus the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and TL240 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and TL240.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung TL240 to render more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also referred to as | PL50 | ST5000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $140 | $171 |