Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Samsung WB1100F front
Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL50
Samsung WB1100F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB1100F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SL202 was revealed 5 years before the WB1100F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SL202 scores vs the WB1100F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB1100F

 SL202 WB1100F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Samsung SL202

 WB1100F SL202 
RevealedJanuary 2014February 2009Newer by 59 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB1100F

 SL202 WB1100F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 features external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB1100F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SL202 versus the WB1100F.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and WB1100F is 94 and 67 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and WB1100F.

As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB1100F to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB1100F Portrait photography details
25
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
37
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL202
Street photography with Samsung WB1100F
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors (512g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB1100F as a Sports photography camera
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
excellent zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB1100F Travel photography highlights
57
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long zoom (875mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (512 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB1100F Landscape photography information
27
rather wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
45
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging info
Samsung WB1100F Vlogging info
27
rather wide (28mm)
includes face detect focus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone port
23
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competitors (512 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB1100F
 Samsung SL202Samsung WB1100F
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Samsung
Model Samsung SL202 Samsung WB1100F
Otherwise known as PL50 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-02-17 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.60 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168g (0.37 pounds) 512g (1.13 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A SLB-10A
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $140 $250