Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB150F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL202 was introduced 3 years before the WB150F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SL202 matches up versus the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB150F
| SL202 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Samsung SL202
| WB150F | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB150F
| SL202 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 provides outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL202 compared to the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB150F to give more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB150F |
| Also referred to as | PL50 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $140 | $230 |
