Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SL202 was revealed 4 years before the WB250F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the SL202 grades against the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB250F
SL202 | WB250F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung SL202
WB250F | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 47 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB250F
SL202 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 vs the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and WB250F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB250F |
Also Known as | PL50 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $140 | $250 |