Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL50
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SL202 was revealed 4 years before the WB250F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the SL202 grades against the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB250F

 SL202 WB250F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung SL202

 WB250F SL202 
IntroducedJanuary 2013February 2009Newer by 47 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB250F

 SL202 WB250F 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 vs the WB250F.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and WB250F is 94 and 93 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and WB250F.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
Portrait photography with Samsung WB250F
25
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
36
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 Sports photography info
Samsung WB250F Sports photography info
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
52
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
Samsung WB250F Travel photography information
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography features
27
pretty wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung SL202
Vlogging with Samsung WB250F
27
pretty wide (28mm)
has face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB250F
 Samsung SL202Samsung WB250F
General Information
Brand Samsung Samsung
Model type Samsung SL202 Samsung WB250F
Also Known as PL50 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-02-17 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.60 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 226 grams (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $140 $250