Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL202 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the SL202 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB35F
SL202 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung SL202
WB35F | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 59 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB35F
SL202 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 enjoys external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 compared to the WB35F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to give you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB35F |
Also Known as | PL50 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $140 | $130 |