Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL50
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SL202 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the SL202 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB35F

 SL202 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung SL202

 WB35F SL202 
IntroducedJanuary 2014February 2009More modern by 59 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB35F

 SL202 WB35F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 enjoys external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 compared to the WB35F.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and WB35F.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to give you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
25
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
37
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB35F Travel photography factors
57
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competition (194g)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography information
27
really wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
43
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
27
really wide (28mm)
has face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic support
31
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB35F
 Samsung SL202Samsung WB35F
General Information
Company Samsung Samsung
Model Samsung SL202 Samsung WB35F
Also Known as PL50 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-02-17 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.60 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 grams (0.37 lb) 194 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A BP70A
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $140 $130