Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL202 was manufactured 3 years before the WB750 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the SL202 matches up vs the WB750 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB750
| SL202 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Samsung SL202
| WB750 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB750
| SL202 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 comes with outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SL202 versus the WB750.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and WB750 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and WB750.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB750 to render extra detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB750 |
| Also Known as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $140 | $339 |
