Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26


82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

The SL202 was introduced 4 years before the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SL202 matches up against the DP1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL202 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL202
DP1 Merrill | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL202 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 offers external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SL202 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide greater detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL202 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also called as | PL50 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $140 | $1,250 |