Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
55
Features
30
Overall
45

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL50
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SL202 was introduced 4 years before the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SL202 matches up against the DP1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL202 DP1 Merrill 
Display size2.7""Larger display (+2.7")

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL202

 DP1 Merrill SL202 
ReleasedFebruary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL202 DP1 Merrill 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 offers external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Examine the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and DP1 Merrill.

As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SL202 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide greater detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
25
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
73
has manual focus
MP count decent (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL202
Street photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
64
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 Sports photography details
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sports photography details
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
47
MP count decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography advice
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography advice
57
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
MP count decent (15MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Landscape photography features
27
really wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
50
has manual focus
MP count decent (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small ( inches)
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung SL202
Vlogging with Sigma DP1 Merrill
27
really wide (28mm)
provides face detect focus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
21
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Samsung SL202Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL202 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Also called as PL50 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-02-17 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches -
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 gr (0.37 lbs) 330 gr (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $140 $1,250