Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sigma SD1 front
Portability
77
Imaging
55
Features
43
Overall
50

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL50
Sigma SD1
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced September 2010
  • Replacement is Sigma SD1 Merrill
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and SD1 (15MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The SL202 was brought out 19 months earlier than the SD1 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the SL202 matches up versus the SD1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma SD1

 SL202 SD1 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Samsung SL202

 SD1 SL202 
IntroducedSeptember 2010February 2009Newer by 19 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1

 SL202 SD1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the SL202 versus the SD1.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and SD1 is 94 and 77 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and SD1.

As you can tell, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL202 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma SD1 will result in extra detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 Portrait photography features
Sigma SD1 Portrait photography features
25
has face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD1 as a Street photography camera
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung SL202
Sports photography with Sigma SD1
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
56
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD1 as a Travel photography camera
57
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
65
weather proof
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
Landscape photography with Sigma SD1
27
really wide (28mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
61
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather proof
no liveview
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (0)
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging details
Sigma SD1 Vlogging details
27
really wide (28mm)
has face detection focus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone socket
9
can't record video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1
 Samsung SL202Sigma SD1
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL202 Sigma SD1
Other name PL50 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2009-02-17 2010-09-21
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 80 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 11
Cross focus points - 2
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 15 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.60 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 gr (0.37 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots One One
Launch price $140 $2,339