Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Revealed November 2002
  • Renewed by Sigma SD10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SL202 was brought out 6 years after the SD9 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the SL202 matches up versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma SD9

 SL202 SD9 
RevealedFebruary 2009November 2002Newer by 76 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k130kClearer display (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung SL202

 SD9 SL202 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD9

 SL202 SD9 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 has got outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Look at the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SL202 against the SD9.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and SD9.

Plainly, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SL202 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung SL202 will give extra detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher SL202 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 Portrait photography information
Sigma SD9 Portrait photography information
25
includes face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
47
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL202
Street photography with Sigma SD9
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
43
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (950g)
low max ISO (400)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung SL202
Sports photography with Sigma SD9
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
36
great max shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Travel photography camera
57
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
29
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (950 grams)
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography factors
Sigma SD9 Landscape photography factors
27
fairly wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
41
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma SD9 as a Vlogging camera
27
fairly wide (28mm)
includes face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic port
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD9
 Samsung SL202Sigma SD9
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung SL202 Sigma SD9
Otherwise known as PL50 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2009-02-17 2002-11-26
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 3MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 1600 400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 1.8"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 130k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/6000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 lbs) 950 grams (2.09 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $140 $3,001