Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL202 was brought out 6 years after the SD9 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the SL202 matches up versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma SD9
SL202 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2009 | November 2002 | Newer by 76 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung SL202
SD9 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD9
SL202 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 has got outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SL202 against the SD9.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and SD9.
Plainly, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SL202 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung SL202 will give extra detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher SL202 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sigma SD9 |
Otherwise known as | PL50 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $140 | $3,001 |