Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL50
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a complete overview of the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SL202 was released 8 years prior to the Quattro and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SL202 matches up against the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma Quattro

 SL202 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung SL202

 Quattro SL202 
ReleasedFebruary 2016February 2009More recent by 85 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kSharper display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma Quattro

 SL202 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 has external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung SL202 versus Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 against the Quattro.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The visual underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and Quattro.

All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL202 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 19MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
25
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
81
you can focus manually
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (625g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Sports photography camera
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
70
amazing megapixels (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
max fps low (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography info
Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
57
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
environment sealing
amazing megapixels (29MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (625g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
27
pretty wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
72
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung SL202
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
27
pretty wide (28mm)
provides face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
22
supports face detect focusing
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low ( pixels)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (625 grams)
Photography Glossary

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sigma Quattro
 Samsung SL202Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL202 Sigma sd Quattro
Also referred to as PL50 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2009-02-17 2016-02-23
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168g (0.37 lb) 625g (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A BP-61
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $140 $738