Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Samsung SL202 and Sony A390, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL202 was announced 17 months earlier than the A390 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SL202 grades vs the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL202 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony A390
| SL202 | A390 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung SL202
| A390 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 17 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony A390
| SL202 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A390 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL202 and Sony A390 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SL202 compared to the A390.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and A390 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and A390.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SL202 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony A390 will result in more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Otherwise known as | PL50 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-02-17 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $140 | $500 |