Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1

Portability
94
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Following is a in depth assessment of the Samsung SL202 versus Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SL202 was launched 6 years prior to the QX1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SL202 grades against the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony QX1

 SL202 QX1 
Screen dimensions2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Samsung SL202

 QX1 SL202 
LaunchedSeptember 2014February 2009More modern by 67 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony QX1

 SL202 QX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Samsung SL202 versus Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SL202 versus the QX1.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and QX1 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and QX1.

As you can see, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SL202 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 Portrait photography factors
Sony QX1 Portrait photography factors
24
has face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
no manual control
external flash not possible
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL202
Street photography with Sony QX1
46
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
supports touch focus
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (216 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 Sports photography advice
Sony QX1 Sports photography advice
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
56
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery (440 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography advice
Sony QX1 Travel photography advice
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
good battery (440 CIPA)
supports touch focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (216 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
26
reasonably wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
63
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
good battery (440 per charge)
screen is small ( inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
Sony QX1 as a Vlogging camera
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing microphone support
32
touchscreen
features face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
no microphone support
more heavy than competition (216g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung SL202 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sony QX1
 Samsung SL202Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Make Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung SL202 Sony Alpha QX1
Otherwise known as PL50 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Lens-style
Revealed 2009-02-17 2014-09-03
Physical type Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 1600 16000
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.6
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" -
Screen resolution 230k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.60 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168g (0.37 lbs) 216g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID SLB-10A NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots One One
Price at launch $140 $500