Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sony Alpha a6400 front
Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Announced January 2019
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SL202 was introduced 11 years before the A6400 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SL202 scores vs the A6400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony A6400

 SL202 A6400 

Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Samsung SL202

 A6400 SL202 
AnnouncedJanuary 2019February 2009More recent by 120 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kClearer screen (+692k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400

 SL202 A6400 

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).

Compare the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SL202 against the A6400.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and A6400 is 94 and 83 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and A6400.

As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL202 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A6400 will deliver greater detail using its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Portrait photography camera
25
provides face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
81
you can focus manually
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 Street photography information
Sony A6400 Street photography information
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
81
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch focus
environment sealing
above average ISO range (32,000)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung SL202
Sports photography with Sony A6400
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
76
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect AF
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography advice
Sony A6400 Travel photography advice
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
87
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
comes with touch focus
decent MP (24MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography info
Sony A6400 Landscape photography info
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (32,000)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging advice
Sony A6400 Vlogging advice
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
provides face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
80
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
includes face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have mic socket
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400
 Samsung SL202Sony Alpha a6400
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung SL202 Sony Alpha a6400
Other name PL50 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-02-17 2019-01-15
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 1600 32000
Maximum enhanced ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 425
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Available lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 11.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.60 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 lb) 403 grams (0.89 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 83
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 410 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID SLB-10A NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Card slots One One
Cost at release $140 $898