Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced January 2019
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL202 was introduced 11 years before the A6400 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SL202 scores vs the A6400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL202 and Sony Alpha a6400. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony A6400
SL202 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Samsung SL202
A6400 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | February 2009 | More recent by 120 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400
SL202 | A6400 |
---|
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL202 and Sony A6400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SL202 against the A6400.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and A6400 is 94 and 83 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and A6400.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL202 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A6400 will deliver greater detail using its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Other name | PL50 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2019-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 403 grams (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $140 | $898 |