Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
44 Features
67 Overall
53
Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SL202 was announced 10 years prior to the HX99 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SL202 scores against the HX99 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony HX99
| SL202 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Samsung SL202
| HX99 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | February 2009 | Fresher by 116 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony HX99
| SL202 | HX99 |
|---|
Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 comes with outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SL202 against the HX99.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and HX99.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL202 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony HX99 will result in more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung SL202 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Also called | PL50 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.00" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 242 gr (0.53 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $140 | $469 |