Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SL202 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SL202 was manufactured very close to the T900 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SL202 scores versus the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony T900
| SL202 | T900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung SL202
| T900 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony T900
| SL202 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 comes with outer dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the SL202 against the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and T900.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony T900 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung SL202 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Otherwise known as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $140 | $300 |