Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Samsung SL202 and Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SL202 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TX200V which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the SL202 matches up against the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony TX200V
| SL202 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung SL202
| TX200V | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 35 months |
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony TX200V
| SL202 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL202 and Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SL202 versus the TX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and TX200V.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Also referred to as | PL50 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $140 | $500 |
