Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Announced July 2011
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Samsung SL202 versus Sony TX55, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL202 was announced 3 years before the TX55 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SL202 grades against the TX55 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL202 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony TX55
SL202 | TX55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Samsung SL202
TX55 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 29 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony TX55
SL202 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 has got physical dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony TX55 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") having a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL202 versus Sony TX55 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the SL202 and the TX55.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and TX55 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The image underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and TX55.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony TX55 to provide greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Also called as | PL50 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 109g (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $140 | $350 |