Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and W380 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SL202 was announced 10 months before the W380 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SL202 grades versus the W380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony W380
SL202 | W380 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Samsung SL202
W380 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony W380
SL202 | W380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 features external dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony W380 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL202 vs the W380.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and W380 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and W380.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony W380 to offer you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W380 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
Also called as | PL50 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $140 | $44 |