Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WX220 (18MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SL202 was announced 6 years prior to the WX220 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SL202 grades vs the WX220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony WX220
| SL202 | WX220 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Samsung SL202
| WX220 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | February 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony WX220
| SL202 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 has external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony WX220 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 vs the WX220.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and WX220 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and WX220.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to resolve more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL202 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Otherwise known as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-02-17 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $140 | $198 |