Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL202/Samsung-SL202-front.jpg)
![Sony SLT-A55 front Sony SLT-A55 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-SLT-A55/Sony-A55-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
56 Features
80 Overall
65
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released August 2010
- Updated by Sony A57
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Samsung SL202 and Sony A55, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and A55 (16MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and A55 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The SL202 was announced 18 months prior to the A55 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SL202 matches up vs the A55 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 & Sony SLT-A55. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony A55
SL202 | A55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Samsung SL202
A55 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony A55
SL202 | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 has physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A55 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL202 and Sony A55 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SL202 against the A55.
![Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 size comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL202-vs-Sony-SLT-A55-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and A55 is 94 and 67 respectively.
![Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL202-vs-Sony-SLT-A55-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL202 and A55.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL202 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony A55 will resolve extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
![Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-SL202-vs-Sony-SLT-A55-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL202-vs-Sony-SLT-A55-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL202 vs Sony A55 Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony SLT-A55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SL202 | Sony SLT-A55 |
Also called as | PL50 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 816 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $140 | $800 |