Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is ES15
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we are looking at the Samsung SL30 versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL30 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL30 was revealed 4 years prior to the WB250F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the SL30 matches up vs the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL30 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL30 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Samsung WB250F
| SL30 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung SL30
| WB250F | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 47 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL30 and Samsung WB250F
| SL30 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL30 has physical dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung SL30 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the SL30 compared to the WB250F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SL30 and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL30 and WB250F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB250F to offer extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older SL30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL30 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Samsung SL30 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL30 | Samsung WB250F |
| Also referred to as | ES15 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140g (0.31 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $93 | $250 |