Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as ES15
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released March 2014
- Succeeded the Sony A3000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Samsung SL30 versus Sony a3500, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SL30 (10MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the SL30 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SL30 was released 6 years before the a3500 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL30 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SL30 scores versus the a3500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL30 & Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung SL30 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Sony a3500
| SL30 | a3500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Samsung SL30
| a3500 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Samsung SL30 and Sony a3500
| SL30 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL30 has physical dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has measurements of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL30 versus Sony a3500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SL30 vs the a3500.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SL30 and a3500 is 95 and 69 respectively.
Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SL30 and a3500.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL30 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony a3500 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SL30 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung SL30 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Samsung SL30 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL30 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Also Known as | ES15 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 140 grams (0.31 lb) | 411 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $93 | $398 |