Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced April 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both sold by Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and ST93 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL620 was brought out 3 years earlier than the ST93 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SL620 grades vs the ST93 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL620 & Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung ST93
| SL620 | ST93 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Samsung SL620
| ST93 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2011 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung ST93
| SL620 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL620 has physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung ST93 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SL620 versus the ST93.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and ST93 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and ST93.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung ST93 to show more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older SL620 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL620 | Samsung ST93 |
| Also referred to as | PL65 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 110g (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | - |