Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB750, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SL620 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB750 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the SL620 grades against the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung WB750
SL620 | WB750 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Samsung SL620
WB750 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | February 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB750
SL620 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL620 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB750 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SL620 versus the WB750.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SL620 and WB750 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and WB750.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB750 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged SL620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB750 |
Also Known as | PL65 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4096 x 3072 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $339 |