Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SL620 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SL620 scores versus the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL620 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung WB800F
SL620 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung SL620
WB800F | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 47 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB800F
SL620 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung SL620 features outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SL620 vs the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL620 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and WB800F.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to deliver greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SL620 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB800F |
Alternate name | PL65 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $200 | $300 |