Clicky

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25
Samsung SL620 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
56
Features
30
Overall
45

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL65
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the SL620 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SL620 was introduced 4 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SL620 matches up versus the DP1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL620 DP1 Merrill 
Screen size2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL620

 DP1 Merrill SL620 
ReleasedFebruary 2012February 2009More recent by 36 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 SL620 DP1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 enjoys outer dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SL620 and the DP1 Merrill.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SL620 and DP1 Merrill.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SL620 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SL620 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL620
Portrait photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
26
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
73
manual focus
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL620
Street photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competitors (168g)
64
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL620 Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sports photography highlights
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
48
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL620 Travel photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography features
50
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (168g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
resolution is good (15MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL620 Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP1 Merrill Landscape photography factors
23
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
50
manual focus
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen ( inches)
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL620 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
24
includes face detection autofocus
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
heavier than competitors (168 grams)
22
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL620 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Samsung SL620Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL620 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Otherwise known as PL65 -
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-02-17 2012-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" -
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 gr (0.37 lbs) 330 gr (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $200 $1,250