Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the SL620 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SL620 was introduced 4 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SL620 matches up versus the DP1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL620 & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL620 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung SL620
DP1 Merrill | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
SL620 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 enjoys outer dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SL620 and the DP1 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SL620 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SL620 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SL620 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL620 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | PL65 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | - |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $200 | $1,250 |