Clicky

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Samsung SL620 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL65
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Revealed April 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma SD1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the SL620 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SL620 was manufactured 4 years before the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SL620 scores vs the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SL620 SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung SL620

 SD1 Merrill SL620 
RevealedApril 2012February 2009More modern by 38 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SL620 SD1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL620 enjoys external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung SL620 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SL620 and the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SL620 and SD1 Merrill.

Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SL620 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide you with more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SL620 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL620 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
26
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
you can focus manually
MP count decent (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL620
Street photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition (168 grams)
57
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL620 Sports photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography advice
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
61
MP count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL620 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (168 grams)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
environment sealing
MP count decent (15 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
23
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
63
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
MP count decent (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung SL620
Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
24
offers face detection focusing
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (168 grams)
9
no video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL620 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL620 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung SL620Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung SL620 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Also Known as PL65 -
Category Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Announced 2009-02-17 2012-04-10
Physical type Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 35-175mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 790 grams (1.74 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots One One
Price at launch $200 $2,339