Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the SL620 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL620 was released 8 years before the Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SL620 grades against the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sigma Quattro
| SL620 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung SL620
| Quattro | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 85 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sigma Quattro
| SL620 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 has outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the SL620 compared to the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL620 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and Quattro.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SL620 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 17MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SL620 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung SL620 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung SL620 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Also called | PL65 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $738 |