Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Later Model is Sony RX1R II
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Overview
Let's look closer at the Samsung SL620 versus Sony RX1R, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the SL620 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL620 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the RX1R and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SL620 grades against the RX1R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sony RX1R
SL620 | RX1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Samsung SL620
RX1R | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | February 2009 | Fresher by 53 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sony RX1R
SL620 | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL620 features outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL620 versus Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the SL620 against the RX1R.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL620 and RX1R is 94 and 79 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL620 and RX1R.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL620 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX1R will deliver more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older SL620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SL620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Alternate name | PL65 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.60 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $200 | $2,798 |