Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
![Samsung SL820 front Samsung SL820 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL820/Samsung-SL820-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB350F/Samsung-WB350F-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as IT100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SL820 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The SL820 was revealed 5 years before the WB350F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the SL820 grades against the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL820 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL820 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Samsung WB350F
SL820 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Samsung SL820
WB350F | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 59 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL820 and Samsung WB350F
SL820 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL820 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the SL820 vs the WB350F.
![Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL820-vs-Samsung-WB350F-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SL820 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
![Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL820-vs-Samsung-WB350F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SL820 and WB350F.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged SL820 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-SL820-vs-Samsung-WB350F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SL820-vs-Samsung-WB350F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SL820 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Samsung SL820 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung SL820 | Samsung WB350F |
Otherwise known as | IT100 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 276 gr (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $280 | $260 |