Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as IT100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed July 2018

Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SL820 (12MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the SL820 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

The SL820 was unveiled 10 years before the RX100 VA which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SL820 grades vs the RX100 VA with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL820 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL820 Gallery & Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Sony RX100 VA
SL820 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Samsung SL820
RX100 VA | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2018 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 114 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung SL820 and Sony RX100 VA
SL820 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL820 provides exterior dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SL820 versus the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL820 and RX100 VA is 94 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL820 and RX100 VA.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL820 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX100 VA will give greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged SL820 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg)

Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL820 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Samsung SL820 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung SL820 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Otherwise known as | IT100 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-02-17 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 299 grams (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $998 |