Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Replacement is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Samsung ST150F and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the ST150F (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the ST150F (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ST150F was introduced 12 months later than the DP2 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the ST150F scores versus the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST150F and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Samsung ST150F Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
ST150F | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung ST150F
DP2 Merrill | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST150F and Sigma DP2 Merrill
ST150F | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST150F comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST150F and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the ST150F compared to the DP2 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST150F and DP2 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the ST150F and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The ST150F having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung ST150F will give extra detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern ST150F is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung ST150F | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung ST150F | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 114 grams (0.25 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $931 |