Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Samsung ST150F versus Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the ST150F (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST150F (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ST150F was launched 4 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the ST150F scores against the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST150F & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST150F Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Sigma Quattro
| ST150F | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST150F
| Quattro | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 38 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST150F and Sigma Quattro
| ST150F | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST150F comes with exterior dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST150F versus Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the ST150F against the Quattro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ST150F and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST150F and Quattro.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ST150F due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older ST150F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung ST150F vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Samsung ST150F | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung ST150F | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 114 grams (0.25 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $738 |