Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST150F versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the ST150F (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ST150F was released 3 years after the T900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the ST150F scores against the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST150F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Samsung ST150F Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Sony T900
| ST150F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung ST150F
| T900 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST150F and Sony T900
| ST150F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Samsung ST150F features physical dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST150F versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the ST150F and the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ST150F and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ST150F and T900.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST150F to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher ST150F should have an edge in sensor technology.
Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung ST150F vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung ST150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 114 grams (0.25 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $300 |