Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
![Samsung ST65 front Samsung ST65 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST65/Samsung-ST65-front.jpg)
![Samsung ST700 front Samsung ST700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST700/Samsung-ST700-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Samsung ST65 and Samsung ST700, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both built by Samsung. The image resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The ST65 was announced within a month of the ST700 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the ST65 matches up versus the ST700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 & Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung ST700
ST65 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Samsung ST65
ST700 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Samsung ST700
ST65 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST65 provides exterior measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST700 has measurements of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST65 and Samsung ST700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the ST65 versus the ST700.
![Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 size comparison Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-ST65-vs-Samsung-ST700-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and ST700 is 99 and 99 respectively.
![Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 top view buttons comparison Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-ST65-vs-Samsung-ST700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and ST700.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung ST700 to render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively.
![Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 sensor size comparison Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-ST65-vs-Samsung-ST700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-ST65-vs-Samsung-ST700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Samsung ST700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST65 | Samsung ST700 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | - | - |
Lowest native ISO | - | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse feature | ||
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $280 |