Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced April 2011
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Samsung ST65 versus Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact cameras and both are designed by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ST65 was manufactured 3 months before the ST93 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the ST65 matches up versus the ST93 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 and Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung ST93
ST65 | ST93 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Samsung ST65
ST93 | ST65 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Samsung ST93
ST65 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | April 2011 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung ST65 versus Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the ST65 compared to the ST93.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and ST93 is 99 and 97 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and ST93.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung ST93 to provide more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST65 | Samsung ST93 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2011-04-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | () |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse shooting | ||
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | - |