Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB210, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Samsung. The resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was announced 6 months before the WB210 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the ST65 matches up against the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung WB210
| ST65 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Samsung ST65
| WB210 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB210
| ST65 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung ST65 has got outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the ST65 vs the WB210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and WB210 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and WB210.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of files but you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $279 |
