Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung ST65 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST65 was announced 23 months before the WB800F which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the ST65 scores versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST65 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung WB800F
| ST65 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung ST65
| WB800F | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 23 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB800F
| ST65 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST65 features exterior measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST65 versus Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the ST65 against the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and WB800F is 99 and 92 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and WB800F.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to deliver greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged ST65 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $130 | $300 |