Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
88 Imaging
44 Features
27 Overall
37
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 28mm (F4.0) lens
- 250g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Launched February 2010
- Previous Model is Sigma DP1s
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma DP1x, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and DP1x (5MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and DP1x (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ST65 was manufactured 12 months after the DP1x which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the ST65 grades against the DP1x with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 and Sigma DP1x. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sigma DP1x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma DP1x
| ST65 | DP1x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1x over the Samsung ST65
| DP1x | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma DP1x
| ST65 | DP1x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST65 has exterior dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma DP1x has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma DP1x in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the ST65 compared to the DP1x.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and DP1x is 99 and 88 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and DP1x.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ST65 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung ST65 will provide extra detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent ST65 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP1x Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sigma DP1x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sigma DP1x |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/4.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $574 |