Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ST65 was introduced 4 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the ST65 scores vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST65 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
ST65 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung ST65
DP2 Quattro | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
ST65 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 provides external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the ST65 versus the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and DP2 Quattro is 99 and 70 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ST65 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older ST65 will be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-19 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 45mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $130 | $931 |