Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ST65 was unveiled 6 years before the Quattro and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the ST65 grades vs the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma Quattro
ST65 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST65
Quattro | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 62 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Crisper display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma Quattro
ST65 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST65 provides outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the ST65 compared to the Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and Quattro.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The ST65 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will provide you with extra detail having an extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older ST65 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $738 |