Clicky

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29
Samsung ST65 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

In this article, we are comparing the Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The ST65 was unveiled 6 years before the Quattro and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the ST65 grades vs the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma Quattro

 ST65 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST65

 Quattro ST65 
LaunchedFebruary 2016January 2011More recent by 62 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Display resolution1620k460kCrisper display (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma Quattro

 ST65 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST65 provides outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the ST65 compared to the Quattro.

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and Quattro.

Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The ST65 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will provide you with extra detail having an extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older ST65 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST65 Portrait photography information
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography information
28
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
81
focusing manually
megapixel count amazing (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Samsung ST65 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
49
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low max ISO (0)
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
heavier than average (625 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST65 Sports photography information
Sigma Quattro Sports photography information
26
megapixel count good (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
70
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (3.8 fps)
no image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung ST65
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
71
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
55
environment proof
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (625 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung ST65 Landscape photography information
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography information
37
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
72
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST65 Vlogging details
Sigma Quattro Vlogging details
27
good maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
22
comes with face detect autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
lack of mic port
heavier than average (625g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST65 and Sigma Quattro
 Samsung ST65Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung ST65 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-01-19 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO - 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range () -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $130 $738