Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was announced 6 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the ST65 scores versus the Quattro H with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma Quattro H
| ST65 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Samsung ST65
| Quattro H | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma Quattro H
| ST65 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 features outer measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the ST65 and the Quattro H.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and Quattro H is 99 and 78 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and Quattro H.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ST65 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will provide you with more detail with its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older ST65 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $1,134 |