Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ST65 was announced 6 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the ST65 scores versus the Quattro H with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sigma Quattro H
| ST65 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Samsung ST65
| Quattro H | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sigma Quattro H
| ST65 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 features outer measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the ST65 and the Quattro H.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and Quattro H is 99 and 78 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and Quattro H.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ST65 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will provide you with more detail with its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older ST65 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung ST65 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $1,134 |