Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Updated by Sony A330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Samsung ST65 and Sony A300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ST65 was launched 3 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the ST65 scores versus the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST65 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A300
| ST65 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2008 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung ST65
| A300 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A300
| ST65 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung ST65 features exterior dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Samsung ST65 and Sony A300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the ST65 and the A300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and A300 is 99 and 64 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and A300.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ST65 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung ST65 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The fresher ST65 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 632 gr (1.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $0 |